True Private Money vs Wall Street Non-QM Loans: What’s the Real Difference?
- Kevin Green
- Sep 2
- 3 min read
In today’s rapidly evolving lending landscape, real estate investors and brokers are increasingly turning to non-bank financing to fund their deals. Two common sources of capital have emerged: True Private Money and Wall Street-backed Non-QM Loans. While both fall under the "non-traditional" lending umbrella, they operate with fundamentally different philosophies, structures, and expectations.

Understanding the key distinctions between these two lending channels can make or break your next real estate transaction.
What is True Private Money?
True Private Money refers to loans made by individuals or small private lending firms using their own capital. These are direct lenders, often local, who underwrite deals based on the asset itself—typically without rigid credit overlays or institutional red tape.
Core Characteristics:
Relationship-based: Many private lenders build long-term relationships with repeat borrowers and brokers.
Flexible underwriting: More emphasis is placed on the collateral (property value and exit strategy) than borrower credit or income.
Speed: Deals can close in days, not weeks.
Niche-friendly: Ideal for unique situations like land, construction, fix & flips, or transitional properties.
Hands-on decision makers: The person you speak to is often the same person approving your deal.
What are Wall Street Non-QM Loans?
Non-QM (Non-Qualified Mortgage) loans are alternative financing products designed to serve borrowers who don’t fit traditional lending criteria. These loans are typically securitized and sold on secondary markets, funded by large institutions and hedge funds.
Core Characteristics:
Guideline-driven: Underwriting is standardized, even if not “conventional.”
Document-heavy: Bank statements, DSCR, credit, and background checks are required.
Longer timelines: Typically takes 3–4+ weeks to close.
Rate-sensitive: Tied closely to capital markets and rate fluctuations.
Volume over flexibility: Lenders often process hundreds or thousands of loans a month.
Where Each Lender Shines
Criteria | True Private Money | Wall Street Non-QM |
Speed to Close | 3–10 days | 3–5 weeks |
Borrower Credit Flexibility | Very flexible | Moderate – Minimum FICO required |
Underwriting Style | Asset-based / Common-sense | Guideline-based |
Deal Types | Fix & flip, land, construction, bridge | DSCR rentals, bank statement loans |
Loan Servicing | In-house or small-scale | Often sold or serviced by third parties |
Interest Rates | Higher (9–12%+ common) | Lower (7–10% typical for DSCR loans) |
Prepayment Penalties | Rare or short-term | Common – often 3-5 years on DSCR loans |
Why It Matters to Investors and Brokers
When you're in a competitive market, speed and certainty are often more valuable than the lowest interest rate. That’s where True Private Money can be a powerful tool—especially for short-term deals, flips, or unique properties that don’t check the boxes for Wall Street capital.
On the other hand, if you’re stabilizing or holding rental property, Wall Street Non-QM DSCR loans may offer longer terms and lower rates, provided you can wait through the underwriting process.
Real-World Example
Let’s say you're under contract on a fixer-upper with a 14-day close. You’ve got a solid exit strategy, but the property needs work, and your income isn't easily documented.
A True Private Lender may fund your deal based on the ARV and rehab plan, closing within a week—even if your credit is shaky.
A Non-QM Lender might decline the deal due to condition issues or timeline constraints, or at minimum, take too long to close.
The Bottom Line
True Private Money and Wall Street Non-QM Loans both play important roles in modern real estate finance—but they serve very different borrower profiles and deal types.
🔹 Use True Private Money when you need speed, flexibility, and common-sense underwriting.🔹 Use Wall Street Non-QM when you're optimizing for rate and term on stabilized or near-stabilized properties.
Smart investors and brokers know when to use which tool—and how to align expectations with the source of capital.





Comments